By C. F. Larry Heimann

Advanced and dicy technologies--technologies resembling new medicinal drugs for the therapy of AIDS that promise nice merits to our society yet hold major risks--pose many difficulties for political leaders and the coverage makers accountable for overseeing them. Public firms equivalent to the nutrition and Drug management are instructed through political superiors to not inhibit vital technological advances and should also be charged with selling such improvement yet should also ensure that no significant injuries happen lower than their watch. Given the big expenditures linked to catastrophic injuries, most of the people and elected officers frequently call for trustworthy or failure-free administration of those applied sciences and feature little tolerance for the mistake. learn during this sector has bring about a schism among those that argue that it really is attainable to have trustworthy administration ideas and adequately deal with complicated applied sciences and others who contend that such regulate is tough at most sensible. during this booklet C. F. Larry Heimann advances a tremendous strategy to this challenge through constructing a normal concept of organizational reliability and service provider selection making. The booklet seems to be at either exterior and inner impacts on reliability in service provider selection making. It then checks theoretical propositions constructed in a comparative case research of 2 corporations concerned with the dealing with of dicy applied sciences: NASA and the manned area flight software and the FDA's dealing with of pharmaceuticals--particularly new AIDS cures. Drawing on recommendations from engineering, organizational idea, political technological know-how, and choice conception, this booklet could be of curiosity to these attracted to technology and expertise coverage, bureaucratic administration and reform, in addition to these drawn to wellbeing and fitness and house coverage. C. F. Larry Heimann is Assistant Professor of Political technology, Michigan kingdom college.

Show description

Read or Download Acceptable Risks: Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies PDF

Best public affairs & administration books

The History of Corruption in Central Government: L'Histoire De LA Corruption Au Niveau Du Pouvoir Central (International Institute of Administrative Science Monographs, 21)

This paintings is a learn of administrative corruption from an ancient point of view. It goals to reply to questions akin to :Can we discover common styles within the improvement of corruption? What are the connections among administrative corruption, political corruption and improvement? what's the old history for present-day corruption?

Current Issues And Trends in E-Government Research (Advances in Electronic Government Research)

As rising developments and examine threads floor within the zone of e-government, academicians, practitioners, and scholars face the problem of protecting updated with new and leading edge practices. present matters and traits in E-Government learn presents an entire synopsis of the newest applied sciences in details coverage, safeguard, privateness, and entry, in addition to the easiest practices in e-government functions and dimension.

Accountability Without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China

This publication examines the basic factor of the way voters get executive officers to supply them with the roads, colleges, and different public prone they want through learning groups in rural China. In authoritarian and transitional platforms, formal associations for containing executive officers liable are usually susceptible.

Extra resources for Acceptable Risks: Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies

Example text

This distribution is a function of the state of nature or, in our case, the state of technology. Having run n trials with the technology, the decision maker observes x number of successes. The decision maker can then use these observations to revise his or her beliefs about the state of technology using Bayes' theorem. I-can be reiterated as long as the decision maker chooses to do so. Some researchers would argue that the Bayesian process places too many demands on the analytical skills of the decision maker.

This preference could arise as a result of the perceived values of legislators, presidents, and other political officials, or it might be the result of an agency's culture. In these cases, we note the following: that political superiors can, and do, initiate oversight with little prodding from interest groups (Foreman 1988). Indeed, some errors are so obvious that it would be difficult for political superiors to ignore them. The explosion of the space shuttle Challenger is a good example of this.

Consider the following scenario. If the official exerts more effort to monitor the agency with regard to type I failure, the likelihood of failure detection will increase and, consequently, effort will be shifted toward preventing that type of error. It is clear that there is some level of monitoring that could offset other political considerations such that the end result is an allocation no different from the one in which only economic costs of failure were considered. The political superior's ability to affect agency behavior through monitoring depends on three assumptions.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 11 votes