By Robert Nola, Howard Sankey, R. Nola, H. Sankey

A few imagine that concerns to do with medical approach are final century's stale debate; Popper was once an recommend of method, yet Kuhn, Feyerabend, and others are imagined to have introduced the talk approximately its prestige to an finish. The papers during this quantity express that matters in technique are nonetheless greatly alive. a number of the papers reinvestigate matters within the debate over technique, whereas others set out new ways that the talk has constructed within the final decade. The booklet could be of curiosity to philosophers and scientists alike within the reassessment it presents of past debates approximately procedure and present instructions of analysis.

Show description

Read Online or Download After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method PDF

Best epistemology books

The Vital Roots of European Enlightenment: Ibn Tufayl's Influence on Modern Western Thought

The very important Roots of eu Enlightenment is a suite of essays which care for the impression of Ibn Tufayl, a 12th-century Arab thinker from Spain, on significant eu thinkers. His philosophical novel, Hayy Ibn Yaqzan, should be one of an important books that heralded the medical Revolution.

Apprehension: Reason in the Absence of Rules (Ashgate Epistemology & Mind)

This paintings introduces and explores the position of apprehension in reasoning - commencing the issues, settling on the vocabulary, solving the bounds and wondering what's usually taken without any consideration. Lynn Holt argues strong notion of rationality needs to contain highbrow virtues which can't be diminished to a suite of ideas for reasoners, and argues that the advantage of apprehension, an received disposition to determine issues accurately, is needed if rationality is to be defensible.

The Search after Truth: With Elucidations of The Search after Truth

Malebranche is now well-known as an immense determine within the background of philosophy, occupying a very important position within the Rationalist culture of Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. the quest after fact is his first, longest and most crucial paintings; this quantity additionally offers the Elucidations that followed its 3rd version, the results of reviews that Malebranche solicited at the unique paintings and an immense repository of his theories of principles and causation.

Peirce’s Theory of Abduction

This monograph makes an attempt to explain one major yet a lot overlooked point of Peirce's contribution to the philosophy of technological know-how. It was once written in 1963 as my M. A. thesis on the Uni­ versity of Illinois. because the subject continues to be ignored it's was hoping that its book can be of use to Peirce students.

Additional resources for After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method

Sample text

However there is rarely a proof that this is so. One task of meta-methodology would be to show that rules are reliable realisers of certain goals. This suggests another weaker a priori approach in which an a priori proof might be given for some particular principle of scientific method. Suppose our aim is to get considerably increased support for our theory. How should we go about this? Ifwe adopt a rule which says 'one ought always to take into account new evidence which is unexpected in the light of known evidence' then there is a proof in the Probability Calculus that this rule will realise the aim.

The rule, or value, of consistency which applies both to scientific theories and to methodologies. Finally meta-methodologies can embody philosophical theories which in turn yield reasons for adopting some particular set of principles of scientific method. , the grounds on which SMs can be justified, or legitimated. If meta-methods are to provide justifications, then there is an apparent dilemma concerning justifications which they should avoid. If we are to adjudicate between truth and falsity in meta-methodology then we must be able to justify any claims we make.

However there is rarely a proof that this is so. One task of meta-methodology would be to show that rules are reliable realisers of certain goals. This suggests another weaker a priori approach in which an a priori proof might be given for some particular principle of scientific method. Suppose our aim is to get considerably increased support for our theory. How should we go about this? Ifwe adopt a rule which says 'one ought always to take into account new evidence which is unexpected in the light of known evidence' then there is a proof in the Probability Calculus that this rule will realise the aim.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.31 of 5 – based on 33 votes